← Criterio · CCO family

Test evidence

Criterio CCO · The commercial functionStatistical analysis of the tests

How Augusto and Valeria perform across 2 rounds of testing, with the margin of every result and each failure with its origin. It is regenerated from the repository’s evidence with every round.

Most recent complete round: 2

José Ñáñez
José ÑáñezTechnology Advisor · Board Member
Published October 30, 2026Updated October 30, 20265 min read

At a glance

The most recent round, round 2, partial, on 9 of the material's 15 entities: 117 of 117 seeded signals found (95% margin: 96.8–100%) and 0 extra; 45 of 45 data items extracted right (100%, 95% margin: 92.1–100%); and 3 of 3 control entities with no signal at all.

Across rounds 1–2, 228 of 236 signals found, 3 extra and 100 of 100 data items right. The rounds repeat the same material: they are not independent samples, and the margin is computed over each round's cases.

What was tested and how

On each entity, Augusto and Valeria run their setup and processing —the commands that process the documents and write the records—, with a token cap set before starting, on material whose key is kept apart and never seen. The other commands calculate on those records with the engine, which is tested on every change to the repository. Signals are compared by name and key; extraction, field by field, against what the written documents say. Control entities carry no seeded defect: any signal in them is a failure.

Coverage: of the seeded signals, how many were found. Precision: of those raised, how many were right. 95% margin: Wilson confidence interval over the cases.

Rounds
2; the most recent, round 2, is partial
Material
Manufacturing · Peru, Retail · Chile, Retail · Ecuador, Services · Peru, Technology · Chile, Technology · Ecuador
Control entities
Control · Chile, Control · Ecuador, Control · Peru
Entity runs
20
Seeded signals
236
Data items graded
100

Cumulative results · rounds 1–2

MeasureCasesResult95% margin
Signals · coverage228 of 23696.6%93.4–98.3%
Signals · precision228 of 23198.7%96.2–99.6%
Extraction · data right100 of 100100%96.3–100%
Control · with no signal6 of 875%40.9–92.9%

Round by round

A round that does not run every entity is partial: the first, small one, before the complete one, or a verification round, which repeats the runs a fixed defect left pending.

Round by round
RoundEntitiesSignals · coverageSignals · precisionExtractionControl with no signalTokensDefects
11093.3%98.2%100%3 of 430.9 M3
210100%99.2%100%3 of 430.4 M1

The most recent round · round 2

MeasureCasesResult95% margin
Signals · coverage117 of 117100%96.8–100%
Signals · precision117 of 117100%96.8–100%
Extraction · data right45 of 45100%92.1–100%
Control · with no signal3 of 3100%43.8–100%

By industry and country · round 2

MaterialAgentsSignalsExtraExtractionTokens
Manufacturing · PeruAugusto, Valeria20 of 2005 of 53.2 M
Retail · ChileAugusto, Valeria19 of 1905 of 53.2 M
Retail · EcuadorAugusto, Valeria18 of 1805 of 53.2 M
Services · PeruAugusto, Valeria20 of 2005 of 53.1 M
Technology · ChileAugusto, Valeria20 of 2005 of 53 M
Technology · EcuadorAugusto, Valeria20 of 2005 of 53.1 M
Control · ChileAugusto, Valeria0 of 005 of 52.6 M
Control · EcuadorAugusto, Valeria0 of 005 of 53.1 M
Control · PeruAugusto, Valeria0 of 015 of 52.9 M
Control · PeruAugusto, Valeria0 of 005 of 52.9 M

What failed, one by one · rounds 1–2

11 failures in 20 runs, each with the defect that explains it: its origin says whether the agent or the test failed. The figures are those of the original grading: 0 of those failures came from the test —the harness or the key—, not from the agent, and with the test fixed they grade as right.

RoundMaterialWhatWhereDefectOrigin
1Control · MexicoExtra signal["commission_differs_from_plan", "comision:2026-10:isabel_mendez"]——
1Control · MexicoExtra signal["commission_differs_from_plan", "comision:2026-10:oscar_delgado"]——
1Services · MexicoSignal missed["close_date_slipped", "corre:OPP-1504"]——
1Services · MexicoSignal missed["close_date_slipped", "corre:OPP-1526"]——
1Services · MexicoSignal missed["close_date_slipped", "corre:OPP-1527"]——
1Services · MexicoSignal missed["close_date_slipped", "corre:OPP-1528"]——
1Technology · ColombiaSignal missed["close_date_slipped", "corre:OPP-1204"]——
1Technology · ColombiaSignal missed["close_date_slipped", "corre:OPP-1226"]——
1Technology · ColombiaSignal missed["close_date_slipped", "corre:OPP-1227"]——
1Technology · ColombiaSignal missed["close_date_slipped", "corre:OPP-1228"]——
2Control · PeruExtra signal["stalled_opportunity", "detenida:OPP-2205"]CCO-4Agent instructions

Defects

4 defects logged, each with its origin, its fix and the run that verified it: 4 verified and 0 to verify. 2 came from the material, the key or the test harness, not from the agents.

Defects
OriginDefects
Test harness1
Test material1
Code1
Agent instructions1
AgentDefects
Augusto3
Valeria1

Cost and next step

The 2 rounds used 61.3 million tokens: 61.3 million in the graded runs and 0 in the ones repeated after fixing a defect. On average, 3.1 million per entity.

The material is synthetic. Whether a version is stable or laboratory is said by this evidence, not its number: stable, with the floor of the 95% margin at 95% or more for signals and data over each entity's most recent run, and no signal in the controls (decision 0020).

Where every figure comes from

The analysis is generated by scripts/analisis_familias.py from tests/evidencias/familias/cco/, and the repository’s verification checks on every change that it says what the evidence says. This page publishes it without recomputing anything.

← Back to the family’s evidence